PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDOFX vs. WEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDOFX achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 25.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX has underperformed WEMMX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while WEMMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


CDOFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.59%
YTD
14.09%
6M
11.73%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
9.25%

WEMMX

1D
-0.17%
1M
7.72%
YTD
25.94%
6M
23.70%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
14.09%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%13.94%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
25.94%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOFX and WEMMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.93

The correlation between CDOFX and WEMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDOFX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDOFXWEMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.38

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

13.47

-7.08

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the WEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOFX and WEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOFX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, smaller than the maximum WEMMX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOFX and WEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-42.48%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.31%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.11%

-21.44%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-27.11%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-41.73%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.17%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-6.61%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.02%

+0.46%

Volatility

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) is 4.61%, while TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that CDOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

5.28%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

12.88%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

17.99%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

19.00%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

20.49%

+0.14%

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison

CDOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than WEMMX's 18.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.10%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
18.11%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDOFX and WEMMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEMMX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to CDOFX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDOFX dropped -39.92% vs WEMMX's -42.48%.

WEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDOFX and WEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer