PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDOFX vs. WEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDOFX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 21.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX has underperformed WEMMX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while WEMMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


CDOFX

1D
0.90%
1M
0.31%
YTD
10.95%
6M
9.56%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
8.78%

WEMMX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.74%
YTD
21.19%
6M
22.91%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
10.95%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%13.94%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
21.19%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOFX and WEMMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.93

The correlation between CDOFX and WEMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDOFX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

2.28

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

3.25

-1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

4.31

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.29

13.24

-7.95

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the WEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOFX and WEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.28

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.30

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.46

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.64

-0.13

Drawdowns

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOFX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, smaller than the maximum WEMMX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOFX and WEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-42.48%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.31%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.11%

-21.44%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-27.11%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-41.73%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

0.00%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-6.62%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.02%

+0.47%

Volatility

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) is 4.48%, while TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that CDOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDOFXWEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.22%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

12.44%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

17.64%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

18.92%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

20.45%

+0.15%

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDOFX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison

CDOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than WEMMX's 18.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.19%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
18.82%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDOFX and WEMMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEMMX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to CDOFX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDOFX dropped -39.92% vs WEMMX's -42.48%.

WEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDOFX and WEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer