PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDOFX vs. TNVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDOFX achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than TNVIX's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX has underperformed TNVIX with an annualized return of 8.88%, while TNVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


CDOFX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.45%
6M
7.57%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
9.98%

TNVIX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.78%
6M
9.19%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
31.67%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
11.62%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
15.96%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%13.94%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
18.31%13.91%11.48%21.31%-11.37%21.85%11.33%19.81%-14.34%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOFX and TNVIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2014

0.91

The correlation between CDOFX and TNVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDOFX vs. TNVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TNVIX
TNVIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TNVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDOFXTNVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.95

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

10.39

-5.02

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the TNVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOFX and TNVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOFX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, smaller than the maximum TNVIX drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOFX and TNVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDOFXTNVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-42.75%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-10.14%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.11%

-20.59%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-25.61%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-42.75%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-3.45%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-6.15%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.88%

+0.58%

Volatility

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Volatility Comparison

Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) at 4.02%. This indicates that CDOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDOFXTNVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.02%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

12.46%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

16.67%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.74%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

21.10%

-0.51%

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TNVIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDOFX vs. TNVIX - Dividend Comparison

CDOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than TNVIX's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.05%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
3.34%3.95%8.76%3.82%2.51%7.05%0.47%1.74%1.58%1.87%1.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CDOFX and TNVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CDOFX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to TNVIX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDOFX dropped -39.92% vs TNVIX's -42.75%.

TNVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDOFX and TNVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer