PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDOFX vs. AUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CDOFX having a 14.39% return and AUERX slightly higher at 14.41%. Over the past 10 years, CDOFX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.13% annualized return.


CDOFX

1D
1.65%
1M
3.87%
YTD
14.39%
6M
11.91%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
9.08%

AUERX

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.64%
YTD
14.41%
6M
12.47%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
14.39%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%13.94%
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
14.41%30.10%11.12%21.42%9.95%45.11%-1.85%27.96%-25.63%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOFX and AUERX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.80

The correlation between CDOFX and AUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDOFX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AUERX
AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDOFXAUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.22

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

17.70

-11.29

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOFX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOFX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, smaller than the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOFX and AUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDOFXAUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-67.23%

+27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-10.06%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.11%

-34.80%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-34.80%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-51.89%

+11.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.62%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-24.82%

+18.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.39%

+1.09%

Volatility

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) is 4.85%, while Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that CDOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDOFXAUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

5.85%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.19%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

16.57%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

24.86%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

24.40%

-3.78%

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDOFX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

CDOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than AUERX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
9.95%11.39%24.55%4.54%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.09%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDOFX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUERX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to CDOFX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDOFX dropped -39.92% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDOFX and AUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer