CDIG vs. UFO
CDIG (City Different Investments Global Equity ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CDIG is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
CDIG vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDIG achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 13.44% return.
CDIG
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 48.17%
- 3Y*
- 31.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $177.13K | $207.07K | $220.02K | |
| $22.27M | $25.83M | $70.04M |
CDIG vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | -0.17% | -0.39% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 13.44% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDIG and UFO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDIG vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
CDIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFO
CDIG vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Different Investments Global Equity ETF (CDIG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDIG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDIG vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIG and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDIG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -50.33% | +38.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -35.34% | +27.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -21.96% | +18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.52% | — |
Volatility
CDIG vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDIG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.96% | 41.75% | -19.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 30.89% | -8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 31.24% | -9.28% |
CDIG vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CDIG and UFO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
CDIG vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
CDIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDIG and UFO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDIG and UFO have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for CDIG.
They also come from different issuers: City Different and Procure.
Find the right allocation for CDIG and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer