CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDCE.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L).
CDCE.L and XLYP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CDCE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 5, 2014. XLYP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both CDCE.L and XLYP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDCE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | -16.08% | 7.38% | -1.21% | 13.03% | 8.39% |
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF | -6.93% | 0.23% | 30.67% | 32.31% | -19.43% |
Different Trading Currencies
CDCE.L is traded in GBP, while XLYP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLYP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDCE.L achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLYP.L's -6.93% return.
CDCE.L
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -12.34%
- 1Y
- -7.36%
- 3Y*
- -4.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLYP.L
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CDCE.L
XLYP.L
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDCE.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDCE.L | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | 0.45 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | 0.77 | -1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.10 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 0.64 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 2.03 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDCE.L | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 0.45 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDCE.L and XLYP.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CDCE.L nor XLYP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDCE.L drawdown since its inception was -23.43%, smaller than the maximum XLYP.L drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDCE.L and XLYP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDCE.L | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -30.40% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.92% | -12.73% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.66% | -10.73% | -8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -6.53% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 4.00% | +3.14% |
Volatility
CDCE.L vs. XLYP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDCE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) at 6.00%. This indicates that CDCE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDCE.L | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 6.00% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 11.26% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 20.19% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 20.40% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 19.80% | +0.45% |