PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD91.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than M9SD.DE's 3.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CD91.DE having a 12.49% annualized return and M9SD.DE not far behind at 12.24%.


CD91.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
2.09%
6M
9.63%
1Y
66.70%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
12.49%

M9SD.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
3.74%
6M
11.23%
1Y
69.16%
3Y*
40.66%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
2.09%132.40%20.73%2.42%-1.60%-8.06%15.38%49.81%-12.27%-11.24%
M9SD.DE
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
3.74%130.74%20.64%2.95%-2.13%-8.52%14.07%50.51%-13.27%-11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CD91.DE and M9SD.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2010

0.96

The correlation between CD91.DE and M9SD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD91.DE
CD91.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

M9SD.DE
M9SD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CD91.DEM9SD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.56

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

6.47

-0.30

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD91.DE and M9SD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CD91.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.58

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.35

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.12

-0.04

Drawdowns

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD91.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, roughly equal to the maximum M9SD.DE drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD91.DE and M9SD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CD91.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-80.12%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.16%

-27.35%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.16%

-27.35%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.56%

-39.62%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.46%

-55.80%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.41%

-22.37%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-42.59%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

10.84%

+0.11%

Volatility

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) have volatilities of 13.40% and 13.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CD91.DEM9SD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

13.40%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

33.87%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.29%

42.57%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.31%

34.36%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.40%

34.73%

-0.33%

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CD91.DE and M9SD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

CD91.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Dividend Comparison

CD91.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while M9SD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
0.13%0.14%0.31%2.37%1.05%0.46%0.14%0.30%0.00%0.57%
M9SD.DE
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CD91.DE and M9SD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CD91.DE and M9SD.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

CD91.DE is categorized as Gold, while M9SD.DE is Precious Metals. Both ETFs track NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and China Post Global.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD91.DE and M9SD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer