PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD91.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CD91.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 12.49%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.


CD91.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
67.95%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
12.49%

LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
16.45%
YTD
63.83%
6M
64.57%
1Y
130.64%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
2.09%132.40%20.73%2.42%-1.60%-8.06%15.38%49.81%-12.27%-11.24%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%-34.66%37.56%23.03%39.73%-5.73%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CD91.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2010

0.12

The correlation between CD91.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD91.DE
CD91.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CD91.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.59

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

10.37

-7.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

32.83

-26.65

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD91.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CD91.DELSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

4.27

-2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.15

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

1.09

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.82

-0.73

Drawdowns

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD91.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD91.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CD91.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-39.77%

-40.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.16%

-12.53%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.16%

-36.22%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.56%

-39.77%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.46%

-39.77%

-15.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.41%

-3.34%

-20.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-9.37%

-37.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

3.96%

+6.99%

Volatility

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) at 11.23%. This indicates that CD91.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CD91.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

11.23%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

22.18%

+11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.29%

30.40%

+11.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.31%

31.21%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.40%

26.06%

+8.34%

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CD91.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CD91.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

CD91.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
0.13%0.14%0.31%2.37%1.05%0.46%0.14%0.30%0.00%0.57%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CD91.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CD91.DE.

CD91.DE is categorized as Gold, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. CD91.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CD91.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD91.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer