PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD91.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than IS0E.DE's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CD91.DE has underperformed IS0E.DE with an annualized return of 12.49%, while IS0E.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


CD91.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
67.95%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
12.49%

IS0E.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
7.80%
1Y
59.37%
3Y*
38.14%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
2.09%132.40%20.73%2.42%-1.60%-8.06%15.38%49.81%-12.27%-11.24%
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
-0.06%129.59%18.76%6.29%-3.80%-3.04%13.47%44.05%-4.38%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CD91.DE and IS0E.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012

0.95

The correlation between CD91.DE and IS0E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD91.DE
CD91.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0E.DE
IS0E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CD91.DEIS0E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.17

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

5.45

+0.72

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD91.DE and IS0E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CD91.DEIS0E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.24

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.58

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.43

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.18

-0.09

Drawdowns

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD91.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, which is greater than IS0E.DE's maximum drawdown of -71.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD91.DE and IS0E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CD91.DEIS0E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-71.63%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.16%

-27.26%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.16%

-27.26%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.56%

-38.03%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.46%

-45.62%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.41%

-22.93%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-33.74%

-12.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

10.85%

+0.10%

Volatility

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) have volatilities of 13.40% and 12.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CD91.DEIS0E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

12.84%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

33.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.29%

47.58%

-5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.31%

33.83%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.40%

32.53%

+1.87%

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CD91.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IS0E.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CD91.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Dividend Comparison

CD91.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while IS0E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
0.13%0.14%0.31%2.37%1.05%0.46%0.14%0.30%0.00%0.57%
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CD91.DE and IS0E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IS0E.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS0E.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CD91.DE.

CD91.DE is categorized as Gold, while IS0E.DE is Precious Metals. CD91.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS, while IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CD91.DE and 0.55% for IS0E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD91.DE and IS0E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer