CD vs. MBX
CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc) and MBX (MBX Biosciences, Inc) are both stocks. CD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while MBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, CD returned 22.80% vs 311.78% for MBX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CD vs. MBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CD achieves a -4.63% return, which is significantly lower than MBX's 31.86% return.
CD
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -54.81%
- YTD
- -4.63%
- 6M
- -14.13%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.10%
- 5Y*
- -6.72%
- 10Y*
- -24.74%
MBX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 34.25%
- YTD
- 31.86%
- 6M
- 50.14%
- 1Y
- 311.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CD vs. MBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CD Chaince Digital Holdings Inc | -4.63% | -27.23% | 465.63% |
MBX MBX Biosciences, Inc | 31.86% | 71.13% | -19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CD and MBX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
CD:
-$0.23
MBX:
-$2.30
CD:
$1.67M
MBX:
$0.00
CD:
-$1.10M
MBX:
-$160.00K
CD:
-$10.65M
MBX:
-$96.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CD vs. MBX — Risk / Return Rank
CD
MBX
CD vs. MBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CD | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.44 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 8.35 | -8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 15.95 | -15.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CD vs. MBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CD drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than MBX's maximum drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD and MBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CD | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.79% | -77.71% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.83% | -37.60% | -52.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.22% | -3.59% | -94.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.01% | -34.65% | -55.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.91% | 19.65% | +48.26% |
Volatility
CD vs. MBX - Volatility Comparison
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) has a higher volatility of 43.41% compared to MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) at 23.18%. This indicates that CD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CD | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.41% | 23.18% | +20.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.24% | 60.53% | +44.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.02% | 135.43% | +51.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.86% | 118.99% | +32.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.04% | 118.99% | +27.05% |
Dividends
CD vs. MBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CD nor MBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CD vs. MBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chaince Digital Holdings Inc and MBX Biosciences, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CD and MBX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CD has higher volatility (43.41%) compared to MBX (23.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CD dropped -99.79% vs MBX's -77.71%.
MBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CD and MBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer