PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCVAX vs. TNVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCVAX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than TNVIX's 16.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CCVAX has underperformed TNVIX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while TNVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.


CCVAX

1D
1.07%
1M
0.21%
YTD
2.13%
6M
0.69%
1Y
-1.62%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
7.78%

TNVIX

1D
0.83%
1M
1.59%
YTD
16.43%
6M
17.46%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCVAX
Calvert Small-Cap Fund
2.13%-6.30%11.92%11.45%-16.14%19.81%14.64%26.02%-6.94%13.42%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
16.43%13.91%11.48%21.31%-11.37%21.85%11.33%19.81%-14.34%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CCVAX and TNVIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2014

0.89

The correlation between CCVAX and TNVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCVAX vs. TNVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCVAX
CCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TNVIX
TNVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TNVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCVAXTNVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.38

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

3.70

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

13.07

-13.11

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCVAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the TNVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCVAX and TNVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCVAXTNVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.24

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.47

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.49

-0.17

Drawdowns

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCVAX drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than TNVIX's maximum drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVAX and TNVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCVAXTNVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-42.75%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.23%

-10.14%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.02%

-20.59%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-25.61%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-42.75%

+6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.88%

-1.18%

-10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-6.21%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

2.87%

+3.07%

Volatility

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Small-Cap Fund (CCVAX) is 4.58%, while 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that CCVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCVAXTNVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.29%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

12.17%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

16.76%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

19.80%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

21.14%

-1.16%

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TNVIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCVAX vs. TNVIX - Dividend Comparison

CCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.83%, more than TNVIX's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCVAX
Calvert Small-Cap Fund
13.83%14.12%1.47%0.12%1.43%7.26%0.00%1.23%5.97%14.34%1.39%9.12%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
3.39%3.95%8.76%3.82%2.51%7.05%0.47%1.74%1.58%1.87%1.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CCVAX and TNVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TNVIX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to CCVAX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCVAX dropped -55.18% vs TNVIX's -42.75%.

TNVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCVAX and TNVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer