PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCSB vs. TSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCSB vs. TSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSB achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than TSEC's 1.83% return.


CCSB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.13%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSEC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.01%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSB vs. TSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCSB
Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF
1.40%4.37%3.89%
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
1.83%7.47%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSB and TSEC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCSB vs. TSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSB
CCSB Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CCSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEC
TSEC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSB vs. TSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCSBTSECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.49

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.36

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

10.96

-10.73

CCSB vs. TSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSB Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the TSEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSB and TSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCSB vs. TSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSB drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than TSEC's maximum drawdown of -1.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSB and TSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSBTSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-1.78%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-1.67%

-13.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

0.00%

-11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-0.33%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.73%

0.51%

+10.22%

Volatility

CCSB vs. TSEC - Volatility Comparison

Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) at 0.39%. This indicates that CCSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSBTSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.39%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.27%

1.56%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

2.64%

+16.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

2.87%

+10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

2.87%

+10.37%

CCSB vs. TSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSB has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TSEC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCSB vs. TSEC - Dividend Comparison

CCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than TSEC's 7.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CCSB
Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF
4.59%4.79%3.16%0.00%
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
7.26%6.47%5.83%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCSB and TSEC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCSB has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to TSEC (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSB dropped -14.95% vs TSEC's -1.78%.

On 1-year performance, TSEC leads with 5.61% vs 2.47% for CCSB. On fees, TSEC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TSEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSEC has performed better with a 5.61% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSEC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CCSB.

TSEC has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 4.59% for CCSB.

They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and Touchstone. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CCSB and 0.40% for TSEC.

TSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCSB and TSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer