CCSB vs. DDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCSB (Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCSB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Carbon Collective, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCSB charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.

Performance

CCSB vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSB achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.23% return.

CCSB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 2.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DDV

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSB vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCSB Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF	0.92%	0.74%
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	2.23%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSB and DDV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

CCSB vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSB

CCSB Risk / Return Rank: 13
CCSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CCSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSB vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSB	DDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSB	DDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	2.06	-1.73

Drawdowns

CCSB vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSB drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSB and DDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSB	DDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-1.92%	-13.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-0.12%	-11.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-0.35%	-4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCSB	DDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	2.68%	+16.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.43%	2.68%	+10.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.43%	2.68%	+10.75%

CCSB vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSB has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSB vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

CCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCSB Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF	4.61%	4.79%	3.16%
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	1.21%	0.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSB and DDV in my portfolio?

CCSB and DDV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCSB or DDV?

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSB or DDV?

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CCSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSB or DDV?

CCSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

What is the main difference between CCSB and DDV?

CCSB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CCSB and 0.25% for DDV.