PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRP vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRP vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRP achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.61% return.


CCRP

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.48%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OVT

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.07%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRP vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CCRP
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF
0.48%-0.12%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
2.61%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRP and OVT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.62

CCRP vs. OVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CCRP
OVT

Financial Services

4.4%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

CCRP
4.4%
OVT
11.8%

Basic Materials

CCRP

-

OVT
1.8%

Communication Services

CCRP

-

OVT
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CCRP

-

OVT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

CCRP

-

OVT
4.9%

Energy

CCRP

-

OVT
3.5%

Healthcare

CCRP

-

OVT
8.5%

Industrials

CCRP

-

OVT
8.3%

Real Estate

CCRP

-

OVT
1.9%

Technology

CCRP

-

OVT
35.6%

Utilities

CCRP

-

OVT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRP vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRP

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRP vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCRP vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRPOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.69

-0.52

Drawdowns

CCRP vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRP drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum OVT drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRP and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRPOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-13.59%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.41%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-3.39%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

Volatility

CCRP vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRPOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

3.44%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

4.63%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.78%

4.54%

+0.24%

CCRP vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRP vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

CCRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than OVT's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CCRP
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF
2.03%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.17%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRP and OVT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCRP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCRP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 2.03% for CCRP.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CCRP and 0.80% for OVT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRP and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer