CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index, while ONEQ.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CI. CCOM.TO is passively managed, while ONEQ.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCOM.TO returned 7.07%/yr vs 20.30%/yr for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CCOM.TO having a 14.45% return and ONEQ.TO slightly lower at 13.96%.
CCOM.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 14.45% | 6.96% | 5.90% | -2.46% | 1.40% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 13.96% | 17.62% | 22.45% | 19.07% | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM.TO
ONEQ.TO
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOM.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.80 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 16.75 | -8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM.TO and ONEQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -34.40% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -6.66% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.18% | -16.08% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -1.20% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -3.69% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.51% | +1.13% |
Volatility
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.83% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 9.93% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 12.03% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 13.29% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 13.91% | -5.47% |
Dividends
CCOM.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 13.14% | 3.48% | 6.99% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.60% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCOM.TO is categorized as Commodities, while ONEQ.TO is Global Equities.
Find the right allocation for CCOM.TO and ONEQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer