PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
12.19%6.96%5.90%-6.06%
CMNY.TO
CI Money Market ETF CAD Series
0.58%2.83%4.77%2.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOM.TO achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than CMNY.TO's 0.58% return.


CCOM.TO

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.15%
YTD
12.19%
6M
16.16%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
10Y*

CMNY.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.17%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOM.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNY.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOM.TO
CCOM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CMNY.TO
CMNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CMNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCOM.TOCMNY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

6.89

-5.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

15.61

-13.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

3.36

-2.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

43.53

-41.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

175.90

-170.66

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the CMNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOM.TO and CMNY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOM.TOCMNY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

6.89

-5.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

3.72

-2.89

Correlation

The correlation between CCOM.TO and CMNY.TO is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than CMNY.TO's 2.64% yield.


TTM202520242023
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
7.48%3.48%6.99%4.21%
CMNY.TO
CI Money Market ETF CAD Series
2.64%2.89%4.64%2.02%

Drawdowns

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOM.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, which is greater than CMNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM.TO and CMNY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOM.TOCMNY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-0.83%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.05%

-0.06%

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.01%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-0.05%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.01%

+2.90%

Volatility

CCOM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) at 0.09%. This indicates that CCOM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCOM.TOCMNY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

0.09%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

0.25%

+7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

0.38%

+9.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

1.05%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.19%

1.05%

+7.14%