PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOM.TO vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CCOM.TO is traded in CAD, while AVDV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVDV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOM.TO achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 17.51% return.


CCOM.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
14.12%
6M
13.88%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
10Y*

AVDV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.06%
YTD
17.51%
6M
19.08%
1Y
46.09%
3Y*
29.50%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
14.12%6.96%5.90%-2.46%1.40%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
17.51%42.52%18.00%14.27%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOM.TO and AVDV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2022

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOM.TO
CCOM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCOM.TOAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.60

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

3.65

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

15.82

-1.60

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOM.TO and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOM.TOAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.25

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.03

-0.20

Drawdowns

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOM.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM.TO and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOM.TOAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-36.44%

+26.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.45%

-12.67%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

-14.64%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-0.75%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-4.85%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

2.92%

-1.44%

Volatility

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOM.TOAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.74%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

12.09%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

14.28%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.42%

14.02%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

16.18%

-7.76%

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOM.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCOM.TO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than AVDV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
7.35%3.48%6.99%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOM.TO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.

CCOM.TO is categorized as Commodities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for CCOM.TO and 0.36% for AVDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOM.TO and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer