CCMMX vs. TGFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Conestoga Mid Cap Fund (CCMMX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX).
CCMMX is managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors. It was launched on Jun 28, 2021. TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.
Performance
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCMMX Conestoga Mid Cap Fund | 0.14% | -2.22% | 3.84% | 22.45% | -30.34% | 6.80% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | -3.59% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | -11.08% |
Returns By Period
CCMMX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGFRX
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCMMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TGFRX's 2.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCMMX vs. TGFRX — Risk / Return Rank
CCMMX
TGFRX
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Mid Cap Fund (CCMMX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCMMX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.02 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CCMMX and TGFRX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Dividend Comparison
CCMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than TGFRX's 13.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCMMX Conestoga Mid Cap Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 13.51% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% |
Drawdowns
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCMMX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -95.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -92.80% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.21% | — |
Volatility
CCMMX vs. TGFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCMMX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 34.96% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 793.45% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 561.16% | — |