CCLFX vs. TYHYX
CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) and TYHYX (Pioneer High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CCLFX returned 8.75%/yr vs 3.10%/yr for TYHYX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCLFX charges 3.42%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TYHYX.
Performance
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than TYHYX's 1.96% return.
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
TYHYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 2.33% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
TYHYX Pioneer High Yield Fund | 1.96% | 7.99% | 6.55% | 9.17% | -11.19% | 5.99% | 3.35% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCLFX and TYHYX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CCLFX and TYHYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCLFX vs. TYHYX — Risk / Return Rank
CCLFX
TYHYX
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Pioneer High Yield Fund (TYHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCLFX | TYHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.50 | 2.32 | +6.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 20.12 | 3.97 | +16.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.24 | 1.56 | +5.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 39.22 | 3.37 | +35.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 215.60 | 16.63 | +198.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCLFX | TYHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50 | 2.32 | +6.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.10 | 0.70 | +4.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.57 | 0.92 | +3.65 |
Drawdowns
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum TYHYX drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and TYHYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCLFX | TYHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -40.86% | +36.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.19% | -2.49% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.46% | -4.19% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.25% | -14.11% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -3.98% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.50% | -0.47% |
Volatility
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) is 0.25%, while Pioneer High Yield Fund (TYHYX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCLFX | TYHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 1.03% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 2.83% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 3.34% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 4.46% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.88% | 5.23% | -3.35% |
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCLFX has a 3.42% expense ratio, which is higher than TYHYX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCLFX vs. TYHYX - Dividend Comparison
CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%, more than TYHYX's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.28% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYHYX Pioneer High Yield Fund | 5.81% | 5.91% | 4.13% | 4.10% | 5.23% | 4.44% | 5.23% | 5.17% | 5.13% | 4.97% | 5.12% | 6.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCLFX and TYHYX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYHYX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to CCLFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs TYHYX's -40.86%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCLFX and TYHYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer