CCLFX vs. SGOV
Compare and contrast key facts about Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV).
CCLFX is managed by Cliffwater. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019. SGOV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. It was launched on May 26, 2020.
Performance
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 0.96% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 7.55% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 0.88% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 0.88% return.
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCLFX has a 3.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCLFX vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
CCLFX
SGOV
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCLFX | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.00 | 20.61 | -12.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 16.02 | 283.87 | -267.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.88 | 201.33 | -195.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.71 | 411.31 | -394.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 101.37 | 4,618.08 | -4,516.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCLFX | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00 | 20.61 | -12.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.15 | 14.12 | -8.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.53 | 12.34 | -7.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCLFX and SGOV is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than SGOV's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.37% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.95% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and SGOV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCLFX | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -0.03% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | -0.01% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.25% | -0.03% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.00% | +0.08% |
Volatility
CCLFX vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) has a higher volatility of 0.23% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that CCLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCLFX | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 0.06% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 0.13% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97% | 0.20% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.74% | 0.24% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.89% | 0.24% | +1.65% |