CCLFX vs. PLTR
CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by Cliffwater, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CCLFX returned 8.75%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 2.43% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 3.35% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCLFX and PLTR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCLFX vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
CCLFX
PLTR
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCLFX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +20.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.79 | 1.03 | +6.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 39.24 | -0.14 | +39.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 218.88 | -0.25 | +219.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCLFX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -84.62% | +80.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.19% | -38.22% | +38.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.46% | -40.61% | +40.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.25% | -79.14% | +76.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.22% | +38.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -40.27% | +40.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 21.23% | -21.20% |
Volatility
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) is 0.23%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCLFX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 17.16% | -16.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 38.32% | -37.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87% | 50.83% | -49.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 65.44% | -63.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.87% | 69.75% | -67.88% |
Dividends
CCLFX vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.27% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCLFX and PLTR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to CCLFX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.60 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCLFX and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer