PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCIZX vs. ALTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX) and Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCIZX achieves a 58.82% return, which is significantly lower than ALTEX's 66.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CCIZX has outperformed ALTEX with an annualized return of 28.33%, while ALTEX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.28% annualized return.


CCIZX

1D
3.67%
1M
15.58%
YTD
58.82%
6M
55.55%
1Y
126.87%
3Y*
48.00%
5Y*
27.12%
10Y*
28.33%

ALTEX

1D
6.08%
1M
7.97%
YTD
66.80%
6M
37.64%
1Y
87.90%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCIZX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class
58.82%37.68%27.01%44.64%-30.98%39.31%44.80%54.52%-7.86%34.41%
ALTEX
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
66.80%6.62%-6.79%-2.31%-18.26%-5.09%83.88%55.04%-18.56%27.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CCIZX and ALTEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.74

The correlation between CCIZX and ALTEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCIZX vs. ALTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCIZX
CCIZX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CCIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CCIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTEX
ALTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ALTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX) and Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCIZXALTEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.05

2.44

+2.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.25

2.66

+2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.40

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

3.37

+7.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

41.53

8.88

+32.65

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCIZX Sharpe Ratio is 5.05, which is higher than the ALTEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCIZX and ALTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCIZXALTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05

2.44

+2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.09

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.28

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.09

+0.83

Drawdowns

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCIZX drawdown since its inception was -37.20%, smaller than the maximum ALTEX drawdown of -75.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIZX and ALTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCIZXALTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.20%

-75.48%

+38.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-28.91%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-68.78%

+39.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.20%

-75.48%

+38.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.20%

-75.48%

+38.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-37.26%

+30.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

10.75%

-7.58%

Volatility

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX) is 7.25%, while Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund (ALTEX) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that CCIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCIZXALTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

12.96%

-5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

33.09%

-13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

39.96%

-13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

68.12%

-41.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

51.36%

-25.23%

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCIZX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTEX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCIZX vs. ALTEX - Dividend Comparison

CCIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while ALTEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTEX
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
0.00%0.00%1.50%3.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.12%0.05%0.25%0.00%0.00%
CCIZX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class
5.03%7.99%12.19%4.54%8.14%10.50%9.41%10.49%11.33%10.47%7.80%10.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCIZX and ALTEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTEX has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to CCIZX (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIZX dropped -37.20% vs ALTEX's -75.48%.

CCIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCIZX and ALTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer