PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCH.L vs. ENR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CCH.L is traded in GBp, while ENR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENR.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly lower than ENR.DE's 26.73% return.


CCH.L

1D
1.28%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.34%
6M
27.17%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
16.35%

ENR.DE

1D
4.46%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
26.73%
6M
26.90%
1Y
84.36%
3Y*
87.21%
5Y*
44.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
22.34%43.91%22.14%20.08%-19.68%10.15%23.35%
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
26.73%151.42%301.53%-33.10%-17.13%-30.32%35.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CCH.L and ENR.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2020

0.14

The correlation between CCH.L and ENR.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ENR.DE
ENR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCH.LENR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.12

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

11.21

-9.06

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCH.L and ENR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum ENR.DE drawdown of -80.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and ENR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCH.LENR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-80.03%

+31.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-26.38%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-70.23%

+52.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.54%

-74.05%

+26.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-18.44%

+15.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-29.94%

+15.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

7.35%

+1.34%

Volatility

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.17%, while Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) has a volatility of 15.16%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCH.LENR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

15.16%

-9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

35.58%

-18.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

48.19%

-25.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

51.74%

-27.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.20%

50.21%

-24.01%

Dividends

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Dividend Comparison

CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than ENR.DE's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.26%2.33%2.96%2.94%3.60%2.50%2.35%6.99%1.95%1.60%1.88%1.76%
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCH.L vs. ENR.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Siemens Energy AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCH.L and ENR.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCH.L and ENR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer