PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCH.L vs. 2318.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CCH.L is traded in GBp, while 2318.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2318.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than 2318.HK's -9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has outperformed 2318.HK with an annualized return of 16.35%, while 2318.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.31% annualized return.


CCH.L

1D
1.28%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.34%
6M
27.17%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
16.35%

2318.HK

1D
0.63%
1M
-6.94%
YTD
-9.40%
6M
-8.08%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
22.34%43.91%22.14%20.08%-19.68%10.15%-4.69%11.09%3.27%39.03%
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
-9.40%38.54%42.84%-31.40%9.14%-38.34%3.57%31.99%-9.05%94.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CCH.L and 2318.HK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

2318.HK
2318.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
2318.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2318.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
2318.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
2318.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
2318.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCH.L2318.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.29

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

3.07

-0.92

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the 2318.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCH.L and 2318.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum 2318.HK drawdown of -72.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and 2318.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCH.L2318.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-72.36%

+23.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-20.81%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-45.45%

+27.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.54%

-53.05%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.45%

-64.31%

+15.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-24.15%

+21.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-26.40%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

8.65%

+0.04%

Volatility

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Volatility Comparison

Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) at 3.56%. This indicates that CCH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2318.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCH.L2318.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.56%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

22.60%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

29.00%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

40.17%

-16.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.20%

33.23%

-7.03%

Dividends

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Dividend Comparison

CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than 2318.HK's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
5.34%4.30%5.80%7.68%5.55%4.86%2.44%2.30%1.38%1.50%1.67%1.24%
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.26%2.33%2.96%2.94%3.60%2.50%2.35%6.99%1.95%1.60%1.88%1.76%

Financials

CCH.L vs. 2318.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Ping An Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CCH.L values in EUR, 2318.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


CCH.L and 2318.HK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCH.L and 2318.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer