CCEP vs. IBKR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CCEP (Coca-Cola European Partners plc) and IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) are both stocks. CCEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CCEP returned 13.47%/yr vs 26.54%/yr for IBKR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCEP vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEP achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 41.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CCEP has underperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 13.47%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively higher 26.54% annualized return.

CCEP

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 11.17%
• YTD: 10.70%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

IBKR

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 41.50%
• 6M: 41.85%
• 1Y: 80.51%
• 3Y*: 67.33%
• 5Y*: 41.64%
• 10Y*: 26.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEP vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc	10.70%	21.20%	18.35%	24.50%	2.33%	15.61%	0.48%	13.85%	18.58%	30.72%
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	41.50%	46.37%	114.43%	15.14%	-8.35%	31.12%	31.71%	-14.01%	-7.13%	63.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEP and IBKR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007	0.27

The correlation between CCEP and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCEP : $44.61B IBKR : $40.72B
EPS CCEP : €7.47 IBKR : $3.76
PE Ratio CCEP : 11.50 IBKR : 24.18
PEG Ratio CCEP : 0.57 IBKR : 0.83
PS Ratio CCEP : 0.93 IBKR : 4.66
PB Ratio CCEP : 4.92 IBKR : 1.92
Total Revenue (TTM) CCEP : €41.26B IBKR : $8.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCEP : €14.63B IBKR : $7.75B
EBITDA (TTM) CCEP : €6.87B IBKR : $7.07B

Return for Risk

CCEP vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEP

CCEP Risk / Return Rank: 52
CCEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CCEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CCEP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CCEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CCEP Martin Ratio Rank: 52

IBKR

IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 88
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEP vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCEP	IBKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	2.08	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	2.67	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.33	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	4.20	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	10.65	-9.75

CCEP vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEP and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCEP vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEP drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEP and IBKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCEP	IBKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-63.66%	-15.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.22%	-18.70%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.22%	-38.66%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.52%	-38.66%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.76%	-55.09%	+6.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.08%	0.00%	-9.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.34%	-24.85%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.03%	7.35%	+2.68%

Volatility

CCEP vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) is 6.82%, while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that CCEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCEP	IBKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.82%	11.31%	-4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.68%	27.82%	-11.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	37.67%	-15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.20%	34.50%	-11.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.38%	33.37%	-6.99%

Dividends

CCEP vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

CCEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IBKR's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc	2.41%	2.57%	2.77%	2.95%	3.07%	2.90%	2.01%	2.71%	2.73%	2.97%	3.65%	2.27%
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	0.36%	0.47%	0.48%	0.48%	0.55%	0.50%	0.66%	0.86%	0.73%	0.68%	1.10%	0.92%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCEP and IBKR in my portfolio?

CCEP and IBKR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCEP or IBKR?

IBKR has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to CCEP (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEP dropped -79.40% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.