CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO).

CCCX-B.TO and WXM.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCCX-B.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025. WXM.TO is a passively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Momentum Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2012.

Performance

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	-26.11%	-27.81%
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF	8.73%	16.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCX-B.TO achieves a -26.11% return, which is significantly lower than WXM.TO's 8.73% return.

CCCX-B.TO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 6M: -46.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WXM.TO

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 21.99%
• 1Y: 47.64%
• 3Y*: 25.75%
• 5Y*: 18.27%
• 10Y*: 14.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCX-B.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WXM.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

WXM.TO

CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF

CCCX-B.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)

Return for Risk

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXM.TO

WXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
WXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
WXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
WXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
WXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCCX-B.TO	WXM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.32	0.88	-2.20

Correlation

The correlation between CCCX-B.TO and WXM.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF	1.26%	1.25%	1.27%	1.38%	2.25%	1.04%	0.78%	0.94%	1.44%	1.38%	1.58%	1.51%

Drawdowns

CCCX-B.TO vs. WXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, which is greater than WXM.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCX-B.TO and WXM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCX-B.TO	WXM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.49%	-40.45%	-14.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.08%	-5.21%	-46.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.87%	-4.52%	-24.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCX-B.TO	WXM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.94%	16.85%	+33.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.94%	15.74%	+34.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.94%	16.68%	+33.26%