PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in The Coca-Cola Company (CCC3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCC3.DE achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than XMAW.DE's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CCC3.DE has underperformed XMAW.DE with an annualized return of 8.26%, while XMAW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.


CCC3.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.79%
YTD
13.92%
6M
12.02%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
8.26%

XMAW.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.38%
YTD
12.49%
6M
13.08%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCC3.DE
The Coca-Cola Company
13.92%2.29%15.41%-8.86%17.77%20.98%-7.79%21.70%11.99%-0.66%
XMAW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
12.49%8.98%25.39%19.46%-15.01%28.71%5.50%30.15%-6.20%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.38

The correlation between CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCC3.DE
CCC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CCC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CCC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XMAW.DE
XMAW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XMAW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (CCC3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCC3.DEXMAW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.41

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.68

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

14.79

-12.55

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCC3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the XMAW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCC3.DEXMAW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.22

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.84

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.80

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.77

-0.51

Drawdowns

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.64%, which is greater than XMAW.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCC3.DEXMAW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.64%

-33.49%

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-7.30%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-22.10%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-22.10%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

-33.49%

-3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-0.67%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-4.90%

-20.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

1.82%

+2.97%

Volatility

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The Coca-Cola Company (CCC3.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE) at 3.16%. This indicates that CCC3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCC3.DEXMAW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

3.16%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

8.70%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

12.11%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

14.30%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

15.23%

+2.75%

Dividends

CCC3.DE vs. XMAW.DE - Dividend Comparison

CCC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while XMAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCC3.DE
The Coca-Cola Company
2.27%2.57%2.58%2.77%2.42%2.35%2.77%2.49%2.74%2.91%2.74%2.60%
XMAW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCC3.DE and XMAW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer