CCALX vs. ETEGX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CCALX (Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCALX returned 9.19%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCALX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.

Performance

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCALX achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CCALX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 9.19%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return.

CCALX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: -1.87%
• YTD: 3.79%
• 1Y: -0.35%
• 3Y*: 1.22%
• 5Y*: -0.29%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

ETEGX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.79%
• 6M: 2.86%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 1Y: 1.43%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 3.51%
• 10Y*: 8.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCALX Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class	3.79%	-10.83%	8.96%	22.36%	-28.16%	16.25%	30.59%	25.42%	0.79%	28.72%
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	7.71%	-6.20%	14.65%	11.28%	-15.52%	21.45%	12.73%	27.57%	-6.00%	14.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CCALX and ETEGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2014	0.89

The correlation between CCALX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCALX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCALX

CCALX Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ETEGX

ETEGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ETEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ETEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCALX	ETEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	0.10	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	0.27	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.03	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	0.12	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	0.27	-0.33

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCALX Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ETEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCALX and ETEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCALX drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCALX and ETEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCALX	ETEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.06%	-67.58%	+29.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-13.05%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.69%	-19.98%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.06%	-24.30%	-13.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.06%	-36.66%	-1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.95%	-4.89%	-11.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.35%	-22.70%	+12.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	5.88%	-0.35%

Volatility

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison

Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.66%. This indicates that CCALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCALX	ETEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	4.66%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	11.43%	+2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.01%	16.31%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	18.79%	+3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.49%	19.80%	+1.69%

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCALX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCALX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison

CCALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than ETEGX's 7.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCALX Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class	5.23%	5.43%	0.00%	0.84%	4.04%	5.18%	0.00%	2.11%	1.45%	5.59%	1.18%	1.87%
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	7.64%	8.23%	5.13%	0.68%	3.22%	13.87%	1.06%	7.19%	12.29%	11.02%	13.88%	23.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCALX and ETEGX in my portfolio?

CCALX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCALX or ETEGX?

CCALX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to ETEGX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCALX dropped -38.06% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.