PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Cogeco Communications Inc. (CCA.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCA.TO
Cogeco Communications Inc.
7.79%4.62%20.02%-18.62%-21.22%5.41%-11.42%76.14%-21.78%33.47%
EMA.TO
Emera Incorporated
7.77%31.95%14.84%2.50%-14.32%22.34%1.29%33.72%-1.79%8.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCA.TO:

CA$3.00B

EMA.TO:

CA$21.61B

EPS

CCA.TO:

CA$7.31

EMA.TO:

CA$3.63

PE Ratio

CCA.TO:

9.66

EMA.TO:

19.85

PS Ratio

CCA.TO:

1.04

EMA.TO:

2.60

PB Ratio

CCA.TO:

0.93

EMA.TO:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCA.TO:

CA$2.88B

EMA.TO:

CA$8.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCA.TO:

CA$1.37B

EMA.TO:

CA$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCA.TO:

CA$1.39B

EMA.TO:

CA$2.85B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CCA.TO having a 7.79% return and EMA.TO slightly lower at 7.77%. Over the past 10 years, CCA.TO has underperformed EMA.TO with an annualized return of 3.84%, while EMA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.41% annualized return.


CCA.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
7.79%
6M
13.74%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
-5.54%
10Y*
3.84%

EMA.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.61%
YTD
7.77%
6M
10.37%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCA.TO
CCA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CCA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CCA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA.TO
EMA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EMA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogeco Communications Inc. (CCA.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCA.TOEMA.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

1.77

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

2.53

-2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.31

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.39

-2.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.32

10.63

-9.31

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the EMA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCA.TO and EMA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCA.TOEMA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.77

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.69

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.54

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.65

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between CCA.TO and EMA.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than EMA.TO's 4.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCA.TO
Cogeco Communications Inc.
5.41%5.65%5.17%5.36%3.76%2.61%2.43%1.90%2.96%2.04%2.42%2.33%
EMA.TO
Emera Incorporated
4.04%4.30%6.71%5.54%5.18%4.08%4.58%4.26%5.22%4.54%4.40%3.85%

Drawdowns

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCA.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.48%, which is greater than EMA.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCA.TO and EMA.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCA.TOEMA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.48%

-35.98%

-49.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-7.37%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.11%

-26.95%

-27.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.11%

-29.73%

-24.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.55%

-1.80%

-25.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-6.07%

-18.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

2.35%

+4.76%

Volatility

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cogeco Communications Inc. (CCA.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) at 4.28%. This indicates that CCA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCA.TOEMA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

4.28%

+6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.15%

10.18%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

13.87%

+11.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

15.64%

+8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.46%

17.40%

+7.06%

Financials

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cogeco Communications Inc. and Emera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
707.25M
1.54B
(CCA.TO) Total Revenue
(EMA.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CCA.TO vs. EMA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cogeco Communications Inc. and Emera Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
30.8%
-68.6%
Portfolio components
CCA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cogeco Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.90M and revenue of 707.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.8%.

EMA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Incorporated reported a gross profit of -1.06B and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -68.6%.

CCA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cogeco Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 181.74M and revenue of 707.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

EMA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Incorporated reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.4%.

CCA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cogeco Communications Inc. reported a net income of 88.68M and revenue of 707.25M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

EMA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Emera Incorporated reported a net income of 87.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.