PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUY.DE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


CBUY.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
3.34%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.79%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.66%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.09%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUY.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.08%4.79%18.71%14.35%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%31.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.75

The correlation between CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUY.DE
CBUY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUY.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.08

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

10.77

-0.05

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUY.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.28

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.82

+0.35

Drawdowns

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.18%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUY.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-37.67%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-11.87%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-22.40%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.84%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-8.56%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.40%

-1.38%

Volatility

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) is 3.83%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that CBUY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUY.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.75%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

11.99%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

16.05%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

20.91%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

21.54%

-8.12%

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUY.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUY.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUY.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUY.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUY.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

CBUY.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CBUY.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBUY.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUY.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer