PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CBUY.DE having a 12.08% return and JPGL.DE slightly lower at 11.57%.


CBUY.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
3.34%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.79%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
10Y*

JPGL.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.54%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.95%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUY.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.08%4.79%18.71%14.35%
JPGL.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
11.57%5.18%16.53%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.77

The correlation between CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUY.DE
CBUY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.DE
JPGL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUY.DEJPGL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.10

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

15.50

-4.79

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUY.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.28

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.68

+0.49

Drawdowns

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.18%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.DE drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUY.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-35.55%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-4.75%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-17.34%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.10%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-4.81%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.26%

+0.76%

Volatility

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE) at 2.06%. This indicates that CBUY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPGL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUY.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.06%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

6.02%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

8.55%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

11.86%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

15.01%

-1.59%

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUY.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUY.DE nor JPGL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

CBUY.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel, while JPGL.DE tracks JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUY.DE and JPGL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer