PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) and Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CBUX.DE having a 10.28% return and LWCR.DE slightly higher at 10.62%.


CBUX.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
10.28%
6M
8.97%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10Y*

LWCR.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.62%
6M
11.28%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUX.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.28%0.69%14.63%0.04%
LWCR.DE
Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc
10.62%6.71%25.11%2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.34

The correlation between CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUX.DE
CBUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LWCR.DE
LWCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) and Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUX.DELWCR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.13

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

12.17

-5.75

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUX.DELWCR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.98

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.30

-0.69

Drawdowns

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum LWCR.DE drawdown of -21.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUX.DELWCR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-21.67%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-7.28%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-0.21%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-2.80%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.87%

+0.04%

Volatility

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that CBUX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LWCR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUX.DELWCR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

2.63%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.04%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

11.52%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.93%

13.90%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

13.90%

-1.97%

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LWCR.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUX.DE vs. LWCR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUX.DE nor LWCR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LWCR.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LWCR.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CBUX.DE.

CBUX.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while LWCR.DE is Global Equities. CBUX.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while LWCR.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CBUX.DE and 0.25% for LWCR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUX.DE and LWCR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer