PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUS.DE achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.


CBUS.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
0.46%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
0.16%
3Y*
0.65%
5Y*
10Y*

EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUS.DE
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
-1.94%3.15%-5.02%2.14%5.57%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022

0.12

The correlation between CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUS.DE
CBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUS.DEEUNL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

3.64

-3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

14.52

-14.47

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUS.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.12

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.82

-0.70

Drawdowns

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUS.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUS.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-33.63%

+20.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-6.50%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-21.73%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-0.31%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-4.25%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.64%

+0.54%

Volatility

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE) is 2.39%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that CBUS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUS.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

2.62%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

7.72%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

11.16%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

14.17%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

15.17%

-6.83%

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUS.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUS.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBUS.DE
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
4.52%4.23%3.74%2.40%0.13%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

CBUS.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. CBUS.DE tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks (EUR Hedged), while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for CBUS.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUS.DE and EUNL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer