PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUQ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUQ.DE achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than UEEH.DE's 2.93% return.


CBUQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.47%
YTD
14.37%
6M
14.86%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
10Y*

UEEH.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.49%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
14.37%4.50%18.80%18.75%-10.33%
UEEH.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.93%-1.30%17.87%3.61%-3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2022

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUQ.DE
CBUQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CBUQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

UEEH.DE
UEEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UEEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUQ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUQ.DEUEEH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.09

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

0.77

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

1.94

+10.60

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the UEEH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than UEEH.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUQ.DEUEEH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-12.87%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-5.33%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

-12.87%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-5.36%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-4.37%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.11%

-0.12%

Volatility

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE) at 2.16%. This indicates that CBUQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEEH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUQ.DEUEEH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.16%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

5.75%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

8.12%

+4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

10.30%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

10.22%

+3.66%

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UEEH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUQ.DE vs. UEEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than UEEH.DE's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CBUQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.24%1.28%1.44%1.58%0.00%0.00%
UEEH.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.68%1.72%1.70%1.89%1.73%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UEEH.DE.

CBUQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel, while UEEH.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBUQ.DE and 0.30% for UEEH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUQ.DE and UEEH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer