CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
CBUQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - CBUQ.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUQ.DE returned 15.00%/yr vs 18.12%/yr for ETLQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.
Performance
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUQ.DE achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than ETLQ.DE's 10.95% return.
CBUQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 14.37% | 4.50% | 18.80% | 18.75% | -10.33% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.95% | 8.12% | 26.14% | 20.86% | -5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUQ.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CBUQ.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUQ.DE
ETLQ.DE
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUQ.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUQ.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.65 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.54 | 14.29 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUQ.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUQ.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -33.33% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.40% | -6.79% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.14% | -21.61% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.89% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -4.35% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.74% | +0.25% |
Volatility
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 3.12%. This indicates that CBUQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUQ.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.12% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 8.11% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 11.44% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 14.12% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 15.76% | -1.88% |
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUQ.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
CBUQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while ETLQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.58% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUQ.DE and ETLQ.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBUQ.DE.
CBUQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBUQ.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUQ.DE and ETLQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer