PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUP.DE achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 14.72% return.


CBUP.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.81%
6M
1.26%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
1.14%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
0.35%
1M
-3.37%
6M
16.19%
YTD
14.72%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.99%0.99%2.05%7.83%-11.21%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
14.72%18.19%24.02%52.15%-17.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.17

The correlation between CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUP.DE
CBUP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUP.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.27

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.24

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

7.50

-6.57

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUP.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.62%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUP.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.62%

-37.62%

+25.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-11.88%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.58%

-22.41%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-3.42%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-8.51%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

3.55%

-2.33%

Volatility

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) is 1.10%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that CBUP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUP.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

7.00%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

13.51%

-9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

17.21%

-13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

21.11%

-15.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

21.59%

-15.71%

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUP.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUP.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUP.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUP.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUP.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

CBUP.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CBUP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Green Bond SRI (including Nuclear Power) Index, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBUP.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUP.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer