CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE
CBUM.DE (iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and UBU9.DE (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) are both S&P 500 funds - CBUM.DE tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged) while UBU9.DE tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUM.DE returned 17.72%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for UBU9.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUM.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for UBU9.DE.
Performance
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUM.DE achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than UBU9.DE's 12.24% return.
CBUM.DE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBU9.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUM.DE iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 8.15% | 15.88% | 21.99% | 25.11% | -8.40% |
UBU9.DE UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 12.24% | 4.77% | 32.31% | 22.36% | -10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUM.DE and UBU9.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CBUM.DE and UBU9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUM.DE
UBU9.DE
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UBU9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUM.DE | UBU9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.36 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 11.76 | -2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, smaller than the maximum UBU9.DE drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUM.DE and UBU9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUM.DE | UBU9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.25% | -33.82% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -7.17% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -23.30% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.64% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -5.25% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.05% | +0.08% |
Volatility
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UBU9.DE) at 3.65%. This indicates that CBUM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBU9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUM.DE | UBU9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.65% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 8.06% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 11.94% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 15.26% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 16.06% | -1.05% |
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUM.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than UBU9.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUM.DE vs. UBU9.DE - Dividend Comparison
CBUM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBU9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUM.DE iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBU9.DE UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 0.94% | 0.98% | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.90% | 1.40% | 1.36% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUM.DE and UBU9.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UBU9.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBU9.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBUM.DE.
CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while UBU9.DE tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUM.DE and 0.03% for UBU9.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUM.DE and UBU9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer