CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE
CBUM.DE (iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUM.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUM.DE returned 17.72%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUM.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUM.DE achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 21.96% return.
CBUM.DE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUM.DE iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 8.15% | 15.88% | 21.99% | 25.11% | -8.40% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 21.96% | -2.69% | 9.20% | -3.72% | 11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUM.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CBUM.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUM.DE
QDVF.DE
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUM.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.59 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 4.18 | +5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUM.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUM.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.25% | -65.82% | +46.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -17.23% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -27.15% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -16.28% | +15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -17.81% | +14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 6.58% | -4.45% |
Volatility
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) is 4.03%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that CBUM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUM.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 6.33% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 20.92% | -11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 24.49% | -12.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 27.11% | -12.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 29.65% | -14.64% |
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUM.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUM.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUM.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUM.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUM.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUM.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
CBUM.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUM.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUM.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer