PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUM.DE achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than D500.DE's 12.32% return.


CBUM.DE

1D
0.34%
1M
0.11%
6M
8.82%
YTD
8.15%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
10Y*

D500.DE

1D
0.25%
1M
0.66%
6M
13.11%
YTD
12.32%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUM.DE
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
8.15%15.88%21.99%25.11%-8.40%
D500.DE
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
12.32%4.86%32.60%22.69%-10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUM.DE and D500.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022

0.82

The correlation between CBUM.DE and D500.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUM.DE
CBUM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

D500.DE
D500.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
D500.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D500.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
D500.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
D500.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
D500.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUM.DED500.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.38

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

11.93

-2.35

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the D500.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUM.DE and D500.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, smaller than the maximum D500.DE drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUM.DE and D500.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUM.DED500.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-33.62%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-7.14%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-23.28%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.64%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-4.87%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.02%

+0.11%

Volatility

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (D500.DE) at 3.67%. This indicates that CBUM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D500.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUM.DED500.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.67%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

8.00%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

11.88%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

15.22%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

16.92%

-1.91%

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUM.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than D500.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUM.DE vs. D500.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D500.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUM.DE
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D500.DE
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.10%1.18%1.27%1.54%1.70%1.25%1.62%1.85%2.08%1.67%1.69%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUM.DE and D500.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, D500.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D500.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBUM.DE.

CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while D500.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUM.DE and 0.05% for D500.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUM.DE and D500.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer