PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBUK.DE is traded in EUR, while KWE3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KWE3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than KWE3.L's -57.39% return.


CBUK.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.25%
YTD
2.62%
6M
0.39%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
10Y*

KWE3.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-17.47%
YTD
-57.39%
6M
-62.45%
1Y
-60.12%
3Y*
-36.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc
2.62%21.05%18.05%-9.04%-1.49%
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
-57.39%-1.73%-17.80%-63.03%-52.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUK.DE and KWE3.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.86

The correlation between CBUK.DE and KWE3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUK.DE
CBUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

KWE3.L
KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUK.DEKWE3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.89

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

-0.76

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

-1.35

+3.23

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUK.DE and KWE3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUK.DEKWE3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

-0.75

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.46

+0.67

Drawdowns

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum KWE3.L drawdown of -98.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and KWE3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUK.DEKWE3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-98.76%

+61.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.99%

-78.98%

+54.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-84.00%

+55.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.37%

-98.67%

+87.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-90.05%

+73.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.77%

44.46%

-32.69%

Volatility

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) is 8.51%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a volatility of 35.79%. This indicates that CBUK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWE3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUK.DEKWE3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

35.79%

-27.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.60%

60.50%

-43.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.47%

80.13%

-56.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.52%

134.54%

-103.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.52%

134.54%

-103.02%

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KWE3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUK.DE vs. KWE3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUK.DE nor KWE3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUK.DE and KWE3.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWE3.L.

CBUK.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while KWE3.L is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.75% for KWE3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and KWE3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer