CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE
CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and KROP.DE (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUK.DE tracks the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped while KROP.DE tracks the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUK.DE returned 13.37%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for KROP.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUK.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.DE.
Performance
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 17.14% return.
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.62% | 21.05% | 18.05% | -9.04% | -1.49% |
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.14% | -4.87% | -2.79% | -25.11% | -25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUK.DE and KROP.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUK.DE
KROP.DE
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUK.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 2.21 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUK.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.62 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.47 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum KROP.DE drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and KROP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUK.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -52.74% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -9.22% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | -27.28% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -41.08% | +29.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -36.46% | +20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 4.34% | +7.43% |
Volatility
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) at 5.58%. This indicates that CBUK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUK.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 5.58% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 12.02% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 15.43% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 19.64% | +11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 19.64% | +11.88% |
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUK.DE vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUK.DE nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUK.DE and KROP.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.DE.
CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.50% for KROP.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and KROP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer