PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than IEVD.DE's 38.21% return.


CBUK.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.54%
6M
-9.26%
YTD
-5.26%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.48%

IEVD.DE

1D
1.55%
1M
-12.35%
6M
34.38%
YTD
38.21%
1Y
53.66%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc
-5.26%21.05%18.05%-9.04%-2.05%
IEVD.DE
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
38.21%10.71%5.35%22.95%-8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022

0.47

The correlation between CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUK.DE
CBUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVD.DE
IEVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUK.DEIEVD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.33

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.36

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

10.82

-10.51

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum IEVD.DE drawdown of -42.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUK.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-42.30%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.99%

-15.87%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-30.25%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.17%

-14.57%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-9.69%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

4.94%

+7.81%

Volatility

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) is 9.57%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that CBUK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUK.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

10.14%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.65%

23.25%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.13%

27.06%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.52%

22.97%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.52%

24.24%

+7.28%

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEVD.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUK.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUK.DE nor IEVD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEVD.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEVD.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CBUK.DE.

CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.40% for IEVD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and IEVD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer