CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L
CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FRCH.L (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUK.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while FRCH.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUK.DE returned 13.37%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for FRCH.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUK.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FRCH.L.
Performance
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBUK.DE is traded in EUR, while FRCH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRCH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than FRCH.L's -5.28% return.
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRCH.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.62% | 21.05% | 18.05% | -9.04% | -1.49% |
FRCH.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.28% | 16.79% | 26.96% | -15.71% | -6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUK.DE and FRCH.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CBUK.DE and FRCH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUK.DE
FRCH.L
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FRCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUK.DE | FRCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.31 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 0.64 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUK.DE | FRCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.26 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.03 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum FRCH.L drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and FRCH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUK.DE | FRCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -55.57% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -15.22% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | -31.05% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -30.96% | +19.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -28.91% | +12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 7.37% | +4.40% |
Volatility
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FRCH.L) at 6.89%. This indicates that CBUK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUK.DE | FRCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.89% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 12.64% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 18.08% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 32.79% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 31.47% | +0.05% |
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCH.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUK.DE vs. FRCH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUK.DE nor FRCH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUK.DE and FRCH.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRCH.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRCH.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CBUK.DE.
CBUK.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while FRCH.L is China Equities. CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while FRCH.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.19% for FRCH.L.
Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and FRCH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer