CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE
CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ETLH.DE (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUK.DE tracks the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped while ETLH.DE tracks the Solactive eCommerce Logistics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUK.DE returned 13.37%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for ETLH.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUK.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ETLH.DE.
Performance
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% return.
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLH.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.62% | 21.05% | 18.05% | -9.04% | -1.49% |
ETLH.DE L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.49% | -0.43% | 8.79% | 17.72% | -6.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUK.DE and ETLH.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUK.DE
ETLH.DE
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUK.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.37 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 0.96 | +0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUK.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.32 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than ETLH.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and ETLH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUK.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -27.60% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -12.61% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | -25.70% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -7.50% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -8.28% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 4.89% | +6.88% |
Volatility
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) at 4.00%. This indicates that CBUK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUK.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 4.00% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 10.62% | +5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 14.85% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 16.60% | +14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 17.49% | +14.03% |
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLH.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUK.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUK.DE nor ETLH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUK.DE and ETLH.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and ETLH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer