PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUH.DE achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than XWEM.DE's 19.94% return.


CBUH.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.74%
YTD
22.41%
6M
23.42%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*

XWEM.DE

1D
-0.96%
1M
6.34%
YTD
19.94%
6M
21.16%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUH.DE
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
22.41%7.97%28.91%6.49%
XWEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C
19.94%8.67%36.15%-1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2023

0.95

The correlation between CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUH.DE
CBUH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XWEM.DE
XWEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XWEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUH.DEXWEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.94

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

3.88

+10.11

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the XWEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUH.DEXWEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.17

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.97

-0.33

Drawdowns

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUH.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XWEM.DE drawdown of -22.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUH.DEXWEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-22.80%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-15.98%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.96%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-5.51%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

8.00%

-5.73%

Volatility

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.DE) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUH.DEXWEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.83%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

12.62%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

26.61%

-10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.80%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.80%

-4.89%

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XWEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUH.DE vs. XWEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUH.DE nor XWEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XWEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUH.DE.

CBUH.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while XWEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CBUH.DE and 0.25% for XWEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUH.DE and XWEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer