PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUH.DE achieves a 26.83% return, which is significantly higher than IQQI.DE's 14.89% return.


CBUH.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
3.26%
YTD
26.83%
6M
27.05%
1Y
37.88%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
10Y*

IQQI.DE

1D
0.32%
1M
1.20%
YTD
14.89%
6M
15.89%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBUH.DE
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
26.83%7.89%28.81%13.46%-16.89%1.62%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
14.89%0.56%14.53%-3.18%-0.38%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUH.DE
CBUH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUH.DEIQQI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

4.23

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.41

10.58

+5.83

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUH.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum IQQI.DE drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUH.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-42.24%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-4.81%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.65%

-14.75%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-11.11%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.92%

+0.38%

Volatility

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) at 4.41%. This indicates that CBUH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUH.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.41%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

8.95%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

10.83%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

12.77%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

14.25%

+2.78%

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUH.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUH.DE
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
2.01%2.30%2.29%2.42%2.13%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.63%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUH.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUH.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

CBUH.DE is categorized as Momentum, while IQQI.DE is Global Equities. CBUH.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CBUH.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUH.DE and IQQI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer