CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE
CBUH.DE (iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) and GTIL.DE (Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUH.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while GTIL.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Xtrackers. CBUH.DE is passively managed, while GTIL.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, CBUH.DE returned 31.50% vs 23.26% for GTIL.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUH.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GTIL.DE.
Performance
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUH.DE achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than GTIL.DE's 8.33% return.
CBUH.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 22.41%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTIL.DE
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CBUH.DE iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 22.41% | 7.97% | -4.08% |
GTIL.DE Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C | 8.33% | 7.95% | -2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUH.DE and GTIL.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CBUH.DE and GTIL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUH.DE
GTIL.DE
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUH.DE | GTIL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.67 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 10.00 | +3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUH.DE | GTIL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.98 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUH.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, roughly equal to the maximum GTIL.DE drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUH.DE and GTIL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUH.DE | GTIL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -21.90% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.69% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -4.35% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.32% | -0.05% |
Volatility
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) at 2.86%. This indicates that CBUH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTIL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUH.DE | GTIL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 2.86% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 8.24% | +5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 11.70% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.51% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.51% | +1.40% |
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GTIL.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUH.DE vs. GTIL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUH.DE nor GTIL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUH.DE and GTIL.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUH.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUH.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTIL.DE.
CBUH.DE is categorized as Momentum, while GTIL.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CBUH.DE and 0.35% for GTIL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUH.DE and GTIL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer