CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L
CBUG.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUG.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBUG.L returned 0.23%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBUG.L is traded in GBP, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUG.L achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -6.40% return.
CBUG.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUG.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | -0.32% | 7.43% | 2.25% | 4.06% | -9.97% | -2.45% | 6.70% | 3.97% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.40% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 15.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUG.L and SGLN.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUG.L
SGLN.L
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CBUG.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUG.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 0.84 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 2.08 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUG.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -53.23% | +38.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -24.33% | +21.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.28% | -24.33% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.78% | -24.33% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -24.33% | +22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -24.68% | +19.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 9.87% | -8.90% |
Volatility
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CBUG.L) is 1.00%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that CBUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUG.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 6.72% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 21.25% | -18.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 24.49% | -20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 22.01% | -16.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 18.34% | -13.64% |
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUG.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
CBUG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUG.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.13% | 4.17% | 4.21% | 3.04% | 1.69% | 1.15% | 2.07% | 1.15% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUG.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLN.L.
CBUG.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. CBUG.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUG.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for CBUG.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer