CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE
CBU2.DE (iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU2.DE is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI Index, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBU2.DE returned 3.16%/yr vs 22.71%/yr for NQSE.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU2.DE achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 14.72% return.
CBU2.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 1.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU2.DE iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 1.10% | 0.93% | 2.28% | 7.33% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 14.72% | 18.19% | 24.02% | 27.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU2.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, CBU2.DE and NQSE.DE have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU2.DE
NQSE.DE
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBU2.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBU2.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.27 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 2.24 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 7.50 | -6.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU2.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU2.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -37.62% | +34.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -11.88% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -22.41% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -3.42% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -8.51% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 3.55% | -2.37% |
Volatility
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBU2.DE) is 0.90%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that CBU2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU2.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 7.00% | -6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 13.51% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07% | 17.21% | -13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 21.11% | -16.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 21.59% | -16.73% |
Dividends
CBU2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU2.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU2.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBU2.DE is categorized as Total Bond Market, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CBU2.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI Index, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.
Find the right allocation for CBU2.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer