CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE
CBU2.DE (iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU2.DE is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI Index, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBU2.DE returned 3.16%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for EUNL.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU2.DE achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 12.51% return.
CBU2.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 1.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU2.DE iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 1.10% | 0.93% | 2.28% | 7.33% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.51% | 7.91% | 25.93% | 14.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU2.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between CBU2.DE and EUNL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU2.DE
EUNL.DE
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBU2.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBU2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.39 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.88 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 15.65 | -14.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU2.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -33.63% | +30.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -6.22% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -21.73% | +18.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.10% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -4.21% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 1.54% | -0.36% |
Volatility
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBU2.DE) is 0.90%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that CBU2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 3.21% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 7.97% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07% | 11.33% | -7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 14.19% | -9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 15.11% | -10.25% |
Dividends
CBU2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU2.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU2.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBU2.DE is categorized as Total Bond Market, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. CBU2.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Aggregate Sustainable and Green Bond SRI Index, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index.
Find the right allocation for CBU2.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer