PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTL vs. CPSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTL vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBTL) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTL achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly lower than CPSP's 3.18% return.


CBTL

1D
-0.65%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-14.75%
6M
-18.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.74%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTL vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTL and CPSP is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTL vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBTL

CPSP
CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBTL vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBTL) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBTL vs. CPSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBTLCPSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.76

3.17

-4.93

Drawdowns

CBTL vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTL drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTL and CPSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTLCPSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-1.73%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.80%

0.00%

-27.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-0.08%

-18.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

CBTL vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTLCPSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

1.42%

+20.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

2.37%

+20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

2.37%

+20.04%

CBTL vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTL vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

CBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while CPSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBTL and CPSP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBTL.

CBTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for CPSP.

CBTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBTL and 0.69% for CPSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTL and CPSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer